Koa and Express are two popular Node.js web frameworks, each with its own characteristics and applicable scenarios. Understanding their differences helps make the right choice in actual projects.
1. Core design philosophy:
Express:
- Built-in extensive features (routing, middleware, template engines, etc.)
- Provides out-of-the-box solutions
- Uses traditional callback function pattern
- Middleware chain calling
Koa:
- Minimal core, only provides basic functionality
- Extends functionality through middleware
- Uses modern async/await pattern
- Onion model middleware mechanism
2. Middleware mechanism comparison:
Express middleware:
javascriptconst express = require('express'); const app = express(); app.use((req, res, next) => { console.log('Middleware 1'); next(); console.log('Middleware 1 after'); }); app.use((req, res, next) => { console.log('Middleware 2'); res.send('Hello Express'); }); // Execution order: Middleware 1 -> Middleware 2 -> Middleware 1 after
Koa middleware:
javascriptconst Koa = require('koa'); const app = new Koa(); app.use(async (ctx, next) => { console.log('Middleware 1 before'); await next(); console.log('Middleware 1 after'); }); app.use(async (ctx, next) => { console.log('Middleware 2 before'); await next(); console.log('Middleware 2 after'); ctx.body = 'Hello Koa'; }); // Execution order: Middleware 1 before -> Middleware 2 before -> // Middleware 2 after -> Middleware 1 after
3. Code style comparison:
Express callback style:
javascriptapp.get('/users/:id', (req, res, next) => { User.findById(req.params.id, (err, user) => { if (err) return next(err); Post.findByUserId(user.id, (err, posts) => { if (err) return next(err); res.json({ user, posts }); }); }); });
Koa async/await style:
javascriptapp.get('/users/:id', async (ctx) => { const user = await User.findById(ctx.params.id); const posts = await Post.findByUserId(user.id); ctx.body = { user, posts }; });
4. Request/response handling comparison:
Express:
javascriptapp.get('/', (req, res) => { // Request info const url = req.url; const method = req.method; const query = req.query; const body = req.body; // Response setting res.status(200); res.json({ message: 'Hello' }); // or res.send('Hello'); // or res.render('index', { title: 'Hello' }); });
Koa:
javascriptapp.get('/', async (ctx) => { // Request info const url = ctx.url; const method = ctx.method; const query = ctx.query; const body = ctx.request.body; // Response setting ctx.status = 200; ctx.body = { message: 'Hello' }; // or ctx.type = 'text/html'; ctx.body = '<h1>Hello</h1>'; });
5. Error handling comparison:
Express error handling:
javascriptapp.use((err, req, res, next) => { console.error(err.stack); res.status(500).json({ error: err.message }); }); // Throw error app.get('/error', (req, res, next) => { const err = new Error('Something went wrong'); err.status = 500; next(err); });
Koa error handling:
javascriptapp.use(async (ctx, next) => { try { await next(); } catch (err) { ctx.status = err.status || 500; ctx.body = { error: err.message }; ctx.app.emit('error', err, ctx); } }); // Throw error app.get('/error', async (ctx) => { ctx.throw(500, 'Something went wrong'); });
6. Routing functionality comparison:
Express built-in routing:
javascriptconst express = require('express'); const router = express.Router(); router.get('/users', getUsers); router.post('/users', createUser); router.get('/users/:id', getUser); router.put('/users/:id', updateUser); router.delete('/users/:id', deleteUser); app.use('/api', router);
Koa needs routing middleware:
javascriptconst Router = require('@koa/router'); const router = new Router(); router.get('/users', getUsers); router.post('/users', createUser); router.get('/users/:id', getUser); router.put('/users/:id', updateUser); router.delete('/users/:id', deleteUser); app.use(router.routes()); app.use(router.allowedMethods());
7. Performance comparison:
Express:
- Mature and stable, verified by many production environments
- Middleware chain calling, relatively lower performance
- Callback functions, potential callback hell
- Relatively higher memory usage
Koa:
- More lightweight, core only about 2KB
- async/await, cleaner code
- Onion model, more flexible middleware control
- Relatively lower memory usage
8. Learning curve comparison:
Express:
- Rich documentation, active community
- Gentle learning curve
- Many tutorials and examples
- Suitable for beginners
Koa:
- Need to understand async/await
- Need to understand onion model
- Need to choose appropriate middleware
- Suitable for developers with some experience
9. Applicable scenarios comparison:
Express suitable for:
- Rapid prototyping
- Traditional web applications
- Projects needing many built-in features
- Team members unfamiliar with async/await
- Need stable and mature framework
Koa suitable for:
- Modern web applications
- Projects needing fine-grained middleware control
- Pursuing code simplicity and maintainability
- Team familiar with modern JavaScript
- Need better error handling
10. Migration suggestions:
Migrating from Express to Koa:
javascript// Express app.get('/users/:id', async (req, res, next) => { try { const user = await User.findById(req.params.id); res.json(user); } catch (err) { next(err); } }); // Koa app.get('/users/:id', async (ctx) => { const user = await User.findById(ctx.params.id); ctx.body = user; });
Summary:
| Feature | Express | Koa |
|---|---|---|
| Core size | Larger | Minimal (2KB) |
| Middleware pattern | Chain calling | Onion model |
| Async handling | Callback functions | async/await |
| Routing | Built-in | Needs middleware |
| Learning curve | Gentle | Steeper |
| Community ecosystem | Mature | Fast growing |
| Performance | Good | Excellent |
| Applicable scenarios | Traditional apps | Modern apps |
Selection recommendations:
- If pursuing rapid development and stability, choose Express
- If pursuing code quality and modernization, choose Koa
- If team familiar with async/await, prioritize Koa
- If need many built-in features, choose Express