JWT and OAuth2.0 are two different concepts that are often confused. Here are their differences and relationships:
JWT (JSON Web Token)
Definition
JWT is a token format standard (RFC 7519) that defines a compact and self-contained way to securely transmit information between parties as a JSON object.
Features
- Format Standard: Defines token structure and encoding
- Self-contained: Contains all necessary information, no database queries needed
- Stateless: Server doesn't need to store session information
- Cross-language: Implemented in multiple programming languages
Use Cases
- Authentication
- Information exchange
- Single Sign-On (SSO)
Example
shelleyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJzdWIiOiIxMjM0NTY3ODkwIiwibmFtZSI6IkpvaG4gRG9lIiwiaWF0IjoxNTE2MjM5MDIyfQ.SflKxwRJSMeKKF2QT4fwpMeJf36POk6yJV_adQssw5c
OAuth2.0
Definition
OAuth2.0 is an authorization framework (RFC 6749) that defines authorization flows and specifications, allowing users to authorize third-party applications to access their resources on another service without sharing passwords.
Features
- Authorization Framework: Defines authorization flows and roles
- Delegated Authorization: Users authorize third-party apps to access resources
- Token Mechanism: Uses Access Token to access resources
- Multiple Authorization Modes: Supports authorization code, implicit, password, client credentials, etc.
Roles
- Resource Owner: Resource owner (user)
- Client: Third-party application
- Authorization Server: Authorization server
- Resource Server: Resource server
Authorization Modes
- Authorization Code: Most secure, recommended for apps with backend
- Implicit: Simple but less secure, for pure frontend apps
- Resource Owner Password Credentials: Username/password, trusted apps
- Client Credentials: Service-to-service, no user involvement
Example Flow
shellUser → Third-party App → Authorization Server → Resource Server
Relationship between JWT and OAuth2.0
Key Point
JWT is a token format, OAuth2.0 is an authorization framework
They Can Be Used Together
- OAuth2.0 can use JWT as the Access Token format
- OAuth2.0 authorization flow can return JWT-formatted tokens
- JWT can carry OAuth2.0 claim information
Example: OAuth2.0 Using JWT
javascript// OAuth2.0 authorization flow // 1. User authorization GET /authorize? response_type=code& client_id=CLIENT_ID& redirect_uri=REDIRECT_URI& scope=read%20write // 2. Get Access Token (JWT format) POST /token { "grant_type": "authorization_code", "code": "AUTHORIZATION_CODE", "client_id": "CLIENT_ID", "client_secret": "CLIENT_SECRET" } // Response (JWT format Access Token) { "access_token": "eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9...", "token_type": "Bearer", "expires_in": 3600, "refresh_token": "REFRESH_TOKEN" } // 3. Use JWT Access Token to access resources GET /api/resource Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9...
Comparison Summary
| Feature | JWT | OAuth2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Token format standard | Authorization framework |
| Purpose | Securely transmit information | Authorize third-party access to resources |
| State | Stateless | Can be stateful |
| Storage | Client-side storage | Server can store |
| Revocation | Difficult | Easier |
| Standard | RFC 7519 | RFC 6749 |
| Independence | Can be used independently | Used in combination |
Real-world Use Cases
1. Using JWT
javascript// Simple authentication const token = jwt.sign({ userId: '123' }, SECRET_KEY); // Verify const decoded = jwt.verify(token, SECRET_KEY);
2. Using OAuth2.0
javascript// Third-party login (like Google, GitHub) app.get('/auth/google', passport.authenticate('google')); app.get('/auth/google/callback', passport.authenticate('google', { failureRedirect: '/login' }), (req, res) => { res.redirect('/'); } );
3. Combining JWT and OAuth2.0
javascript// OAuth2.0 authorization server issues JWT app.post('/oauth/token', (req, res) => { const { grant_type, code } = req.body; // Verify authorization code const authCode = await validateAuthCode(code); // Generate JWT format Access Token const accessToken = jwt.sign({ sub: authCode.userId, scope: authCode.scope, client_id: authCode.clientId }, PRIVATE_KEY, { algorithm: 'RS256', expiresIn: '1h' }); res.json({ access_token: accessToken, token_type: 'Bearer', expires_in: 3600 }); }); // Resource server verifies JWT app.get('/api/resource', async (req, res) => { const token = req.headers['authorization']?.replace('Bearer ', ''); try { const decoded = jwt.verify(token, PUBLIC_KEY, { algorithms: ['RS256'], issuer: 'https://auth.example.com' }); // Check scope if (!decoded.scope.includes('read')) { return res.status(403).json({ error: 'Insufficient scope' }); } res.json({ data: 'protected resource' }); } catch (error) { res.status(401).json({ error: 'Invalid token' }); } });
Selection Recommendations
Choose JWT when
- Simple authentication requirements
- Internal system communication
- No complex authorization flows needed
- Single Sign-On (SSO)
Choose OAuth2.0 when
- Need third-party authorization
- Users need to control permissions
- Need multiple authorization modes
- Enterprise applications
Combine when
- Need OAuth2.0 authorization flow
- Need JWT's self-contained feature
- Need cross-service token verification
- Need fine-grained permission control
Common Misconceptions
Misconception 1: JWT can replace OAuth2.0
Wrong: JWT is a token format, OAuth2.0 is an authorization framework, they are concepts at different levels.
Misconception 2: OAuth2.0 must use JWT
Wrong: OAuth2.0 can use tokens in any format, not necessarily JWT.
Misconception 3: JWT is more secure
Wrong: Security depends on implementation, both JWT and OAuth2.0 can be very secure or insecure.
Misconception 4: OAuth2.0 must be complex
Wrong: OAuth2.0 can choose appropriate authorization modes based on needs, not necessarily complex.
Best Practices
- Understand Requirements: Clarify whether you need a token format or authorization framework
- Choose Appropriate Technology: Select JWT, OAuth2.0, or both based on scenarios
- Secure Implementation: Regardless of which technology, pay attention to security
- Follow Standards: Follow RFC standards and best practices
- Test and Verify: Thoroughly test authentication and authorization flows
By understanding the differences and relationships between JWT and OAuth2.0, you can make the right technical choices in actual projects.