Garfish and other micro-frontend frameworks (such as qiankun, single-spa, Module Federation) each have their own characteristics, and selection should be evaluated based on project requirements.
Framework Comparison
1. Garfish vs qiankun
Similarities
- Both are based on single-spa extensions
- Both provide sandbox isolation mechanisms
- Both support mainstream frontend frameworks
- Both have comprehensive lifecycle management
Differences
| Feature | Garfish | qiankun |
|---|
| Sandbox Mechanism | Supports snapshot, proxy, strict sandbox | Mainly uses snapshot sandbox |
| Style Isolation | Supports Shadow DOM, CSS scoping | Mainly uses CSS scoping |
| Route Management | Built-in routing system | Relies on single-spa routing |
| Performance | Lightweight, minimal performance overhead | Relatively heavy |
| Learning Curve | Relatively gentle | Relatively steep |
| Community Activity | Newer, smaller community | Mature, active community |
2. Garfish vs single-spa
Similarities
- Both provide basic micro-frontend capabilities
- Both support lifecycle management
- Both support framework-agnostic
Differences
| Feature | Garfish | single-spa |
|---|
| Ease of Use | Ready to use, simple configuration | Requires manual configuration, high complexity |
| Sandbox Isolation | Built-in multiple sandbox mechanisms | Need to implement yourself |
| Style Isolation | Built-in style isolation solutions | Need to implement yourself |
| Route Management | Built-in routing management | Need to implement yourself |
| Documentation | Relatively concise | Detailed but complex |
3. Garfish vs Module Federation
Similarities
- Both support module sharing
- Both support independent deployment
- Both support technology stack agnostic
Differences
| Feature | Garfish | Module Federation |
|---|
| Implementation | Runtime loading | Build-time module sharing |
| Dependency Sharing | Manual management required | Automatic dependency sharing |
| Version Management | Manual handling required | Automatic version conflict handling |
| Build Complexity | Relatively simple | Requires Webpack configuration |
| Use Cases | Completely independent applications | Module-level sharing |
Selection Recommendations
Scenarios for Choosing Garfish
- Need a lightweight micro-frontend solution
- Need multiple sandbox isolation mechanisms
- Need built-in routing and style isolation
- Team has some understanding of micro-frontends
- Medium-sized project, doesn't need overly complex solutions
Scenarios for Choosing qiankun
- Need a mature micro-frontend solution
- Need rich community support and documentation
- Team has experience with qiankun
- Large-scale project, need a stable and reliable solution
Scenarios for Choosing single-spa
- Need highly customized micro-frontend solutions
- Team has deep understanding of micro-frontend principles
- Need maximum flexibility
- Willing to invest time in configuration and optimization
Scenarios for Choosing Module Federation
- Need module-level sharing
- Using Webpack 5
- Need automatic dependency management
- Team familiar with Webpack configuration
- Need fine-grained code reuse
Migration Strategy
Migrating from Other Frameworks to Garfish
- Evaluate Existing Architecture: Analyze current micro-frontend implementation
- Gradual Migration: Migrate some sub-applications first
- Maintain Compatibility: Ensure coexistence of old and new solutions
- Test and Verify: Comprehensively test migration results
- Optimize and Adjust: Optimize configuration based on actual situation
Best Practices
1. Technology Selection Principles
- Choose based on team's technology stack
- Consider project scale and complexity
- Evaluate maintenance costs
- Consider community support and ecosystem
2. Mixed Usage
- Can combine advantages of multiple frameworks
- Choose different solutions for different scenarios
- Maintain architectural consistency
3. Continuous Evaluation
- Regularly evaluate framework applicability
- Pay attention to framework updates and developments
- Prepare backup solutions
By reasonably selecting micro-frontend frameworks, you can better meet project requirements and improve development efficiency.
