乐闻世界logo
搜索文章和话题

When do you use git rebase instead of git merge

2个答案

1
2

Both Git rebase and Git merge are commands in Git used to merge changes from different branches, but they handle the merge operation in different ways.

Git merge:

  • The merge command is typically used to combine two different branches.
  • When you execute git merge, Git creates a new 'merge commit' with two parent commits: one is the last commit of the current branch (HEAD), and the other is the last commit of the branch being merged.
  • The presence of the merge commit preserves the integrity of the project history, clearly indicating the point in time when one branch was integrated into another.
  • Merge is a non-destructive operation, meaning it does not alter the history of existing branches.

Git rebase:

  • The rebase command is used to reapply changes from one branch onto another branch.
  • When you execute git rebase, Git reapplies the commits of the branch you're working on to the top of the target branch.
  • This operation rewrites history because it essentially recreates those commits as if you had performed the work again in the current state of the target branch.
  • Rebase can produce a cleaner, linear history, so when viewing the project history, it appears as if changes occurred sequentially in chronological order.

Example: Suppose you're working on the feature branch and need to integrate the latest changes from the master branch into your feature branch. You can choose either merge or rebase to achieve this.

If you choose merge, Git creates a new merge commit that incorporates all changes from the master branch into the feature branch. This merge commit has two parent commits: one pointing to the last commit of the feature branch, and the other to the last commit of the master branch.

If you choose rebase, Git reapplies each commit from your feature branch onto the latest commit of the master branch. The result is that your feature branch appears to have started after the latest commit of the master branch, creating a clean, linear history without branches. However, note that if there are conflicts between changes on the feature branch and the master branch, you must manually resolve these conflicts during the rebase process.

2024年6月29日 12:07 回复

Brief version

  • Merge combines all changes from one branch into another branch as a single commit.
  • Rebase means I want my branch's tip to move to a new base point.

When should I use either one?

Merge

  • Assume you created a branch for developing a single feature. When you want to bring these changes back to master, you might need to merge.

Rebase

  • The second scenario is when you start developing, and another developer makes unrelated changes. You might want to pull and then rebase to update your branch from the current repository version.

Squash: In both cases, all commits are preserved (e.g., "Add feature", then "Spelling error", then "Oops, spelling error again"...). Commits can be merged into a single commit via squashing. Squashing can be performed as part of a merge or rebase operation (using the --squash flag), in which case it's often called a squash merge or squash rebase.

Pull Requests: Popular Git servers (Bitbucket, GitLab, GitHub, etc.) allow configuring how Pull Requests are merged in each repository. By convention, the UI might display a "Merge" button, but this button can execute any operation using any flag (keywords: merge, rebase, squash, fast-forward).

2024年6月29日 12:07 回复

你的答案